The Judge Episode 1: Swindled

by Point and Click Games on March 20, 2007

in Point and Click

the judge

Story of the Judge Episode 1: Swindled-point and click game. John, the chief programmer of Cyber Data, has been accused by the president of the company of illegally transferring the reserved funds in total of 3 million. Guilty or not guilty? You would be the judge to execute the court hearing and to decide the criminal’s fates.

Play The Judge

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, 3.00/ 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Related Games:


Being One : Episode 3

Being One Episode 4 – Moon Rise

Being One: Episode 2

Find It 2! FindIt 2

{ 45 comments… read them below or add one }

vanessa January 30, 2010 at 5:01 am

walkthrough
session 1 testify accused, accuser and the two secretairies
session 2 testify accused,accuser chang l. and john’s mother
session 3 testify nancy, joanne m. adam s. and douglas t.

Reply

Anonymous May 7, 2009 at 9:42 am

I NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED WALKTHROUGHS THAT WORK!!!!!!!!!!!
:-)

Reply

Anonymous May 7, 2009 at 9:41 am

this is kinda good but annoying is there another episode and has anyone got to it yet.
:(

Reply

elijah December 2, 2008 at 12:32 pm

Yo Yo Best game ever 10/10

Reply

julia September 15, 2008 at 5:10 pm

good game u have any more games like this

Reply

Jeri July 23, 2008 at 3:11 pm

PEOPLE IM SICK OF ALL THE IMPROPER GRAMMER AND INSULTS YOU’RE THROWING AT THIS GAME.

Im sick of all your capitals you loser!!!
Use exclamation marks like everyone else!!!

Reply

Jeri July 23, 2008 at 3:09 pm

That is the most boring game I have ever played. And in the top description thing it says ‘Detective, Murder’ not ‘Boring, Judge’.
Jeesh, that sucked!!

Reply

SOMEONE May 28, 2008 at 2:25 pm

PEOPLE IM SICK OF ALL THE IMPROPER GRAMMER AND INSULTS YOU’RE THROWING AT THIS GAME.

Reply

ambeat May 23, 2008 at 11:26 pm

no man!!ma brain inside ma skull hurts……oh well i’ll never kno whole stole the money.

Reply

suck March 7, 2008 at 3:04 am

probaly 1 of the worst games ive ever played
i rate it 1/10

shit game

Reply

Sickness (FD) February 1, 2008 at 12:46 pm

Dude………weird game. I still think that Nancy is a lying little……nyeh……..Why does that boss dude William whatever creep me out? He looks like a stalker o_O

Reply

r January 31, 2008 at 12:51 pm

By the way, Lupita call him Juan only because she is a Spanyard, and this is episode 1 only because they may continue the series with different cases

Reply

r January 31, 2008 at 12:45 pm

To win the game with all the evidences, you’ll have to:
Session 1: Choose John, William +2 witnesses;
Session 2: Choose John, William, Chung +1 witness;
Session 3: Choose Adam, Douglas +2 witnesses;
Veredict: Guilty based on Chung, Adam and Douglas
After that, you’ll see the whole story published in the paper

Reply

Namicaramell January 27, 2008 at 8:58 am

im tired of like hearing what they have to say ITS BORING! and my brain hurts

Reply

alicia January 3, 2008 at 9:00 am

it was ok..way too much reading for a point and click, though!

Reply

Josh December 31, 2007 at 7:50 pm

still boring

Reply

Josh December 31, 2007 at 7:50 pm

boring

Reply

Erik R December 29, 2007 at 7:49 am

This game is stupid, i base this on that the verdict guilty will not be used if the case lacks evidense or ther is a good chanse he is not guilty.

In the statment in the paper it points this out, and the game maker falls on he’s legal incompetance.

(sorry for my poor english).

Reply

John December 26, 2007 at 5:01 pm

this game is long and started to get boring at the end but it was alright i could not solve the case.

Reply

*espie* December 26, 2007 at 1:39 pm

wow that took a long,long time.lawyers?i would watch in a movie,but a gamee?????c’mon!!!! its not worth the time,not for 11 yr olds.dude,

Reply

Jay December 18, 2007 at 8:45 pm

Fantastic idea but I hate games where you simply MUST choose certain options in order to win. It’s like havin a shit load of buttons, tellin someone to close their eyes while you press a number of buttons in a specific sequence and then telling them to copy exactly what you have done. .

Granted this is a tad more complicated than that because there is supposed to be logic behind the sequence but only the logic of the person(s) who developed it and everyone’s perceptions of things are different. While it will seem logical to the person(s) who created the game to choose certain options first, second, third etc. it definately will not be logical to the majority of everyone else because everyone’s perceptions are different. . .

Hats off and a salute for taking the time to develope this little number though

Reply

bounceee December 12, 2007 at 10:37 pm

i didnt get that game at all. i thought to myself that i would try and beat it but after listening to 3 witnesses i got bored so i skipped it all and said the dude was guilty but it said i was an incompetent judge even though a person said in a walkthrough that he was guilty.

Reply

New999 November 23, 2007 at 6:45 am

i saw what happened and i know corectly that hes guilty {or hes friend since he did it and i thing told him}

Reply

Roxana November 19, 2007 at 7:28 pm

rubish, no mstter how you play you dont get a definite end… rubish, if i wated real veredicts and real trials i’d get myself into one… waste on bl**dy time… drawings were rubish too, and they didnt even bother to animate the mouths… thanks!

Reply

fabio October 29, 2007 at 6:48 am

the game is nice you just have to think and don´t be STUPIT

Reply

Liana October 17, 2007 at 6:48 pm

Did anyone notice that the name kept switching between “John” and “Juan?” They need some better proofreaders. >.

Reply

blablee October 13, 2007 at 10:17 am

THIS IS THE STUPIDEST POINT AND CLICK GAME OUT THERE!!!!ITS SO BORING

Reply

i'msuchanerd October 6, 2007 at 12:22 pm

forgot to say, the verdict should be “guilty”

Reply

i'msuchanerd October 5, 2007 at 8:06 pm

ok i finally got this. just choose the following witnesses to reach a reasonable verdict.

(spoiler alert)

session 1:
John
William
Gwen
Nancy

session 2:
John
William
Surfer friend
Security guard

session 3:
Douglas
William’s wife
William’s account
Nancy

verdict:
in session 2, choose the surfer friend and william.
in session 3, choose accountant and douglas.

and you’ll see the result:
computer nerd is highly suspicious but more evidence are needed. (therefore it’s episode 1…)

Reply

mimi September 26, 2007 at 1:13 pm

yuck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

ilona September 1, 2007 at 4:05 am

This game does get rather borng by the end and i got really confused so its a game for logical thinkers (unlike me)! so there u go

Reply

coopie August 29, 2007 at 11:33 pm

Darn it!
I was almost there…

Reply

loneranger August 27, 2007 at 8:06 am

So who is the guilty…

Reply

jen August 16, 2007 at 11:58 am

ehh…yeah, i tried the “logic” thing, but i keep losing, does anyone have any ideas???

Reply

fat August 12, 2007 at 8:51 pm

what a flaming piece of crap.

Reply

Brian August 11, 2007 at 12:42 pm

Bad grammar and spelling. Fun games, but “we know that to revenge himself from you” doesn’t make much sense.

Reply

Angela August 5, 2007 at 6:01 pm

wow…-_-..that was dumb..

Reply

B July 26, 2007 at 8:41 pm

I don’t know about everyone else, but perhaps if this game was written using proper grammar, not changing gender in the middle of a question, or changing the names of the people, perhaps I could have followed the story a bit better.

Also, perhaps some instructions that are a bit more clearly defined could help.

I can’t believe I wasted this much time on this game.

Reply

danny July 18, 2007 at 1:15 pm

this games is meaningless, retarded and pointless. unless you want to be a judge one day.

Reply

JJ June 27, 2007 at 12:55 pm

what a fun little game. Needs a bit of logical thinking, rather than point and click, which it is not…and some deduction. If you are a budding sleuth, this is for you.. However, if you are the impatient type and your trigger finger is getting lonely, give it a miss.

Reply

anyo May 28, 2007 at 5:57 pm

this is just a stupid game with a meaningless point

Reply

Chuck May 14, 2007 at 9:53 am

I can’t find a walkthrough for this ANYWHERE

Reply

majesca April 23, 2007 at 6:37 pm

this is such a boring game. -.-

Reply

Samantha March 26, 2007 at 1:54 am

whats so “argh damnit!!” mean?

Reply

pogues March 25, 2007 at 4:54 pm

argh damnit!!

Reply

Leave a Comment